Justice systems everywhere are in the midst of a modernization journey. Courts, police, prisons, and legal professionals are managing higher case volumes, tighter budgets, and the expectation that services must remain accessible even when people cannot physically appear in a courtroom. As a result, virtual courts and video-based arraignments have moved from emergency measures to a core part of how justice is delivered.
This article explains the fundamentals of how virtual courts work, why video arraignments are used, and what legal professionals need to know when preparing for remote hearings.
A virtual court (sometimes called a remote or online court) is a hearing in which some or all participants join by video rather than appearing in person. Judges, clerks, lawyers, defendants, witnesses, interpreters, and observers may all participate remotely depending on the rules of the jurisdiction and the type of case.
While early virtual hearings relied on simple phone lines, modern court systems use purpose-built video platforms that support the full courtroom workflow. These typically include:
To take part in a virtual hearing, most participants require only:
Courts often provide guidance on appearance, decorum, and technical setup. Many hearings begin in a virtual “waiting room” until the judge brings parties into session, just as they would in a physical courtroom.
An arraignment is the hearing where charges are formally presented, and the defendant enters a plea. Video arraignments allow this process to occur remotely while maintaining judicial integrity and procedural fairness.
They have been used for years in the United States and internationally, and they remain one of the strongest examples of how video improves both safety and efficiency in early-stage proceedings.
Video arraignments can:
For people in custody, video arraignments also reduce stress by avoiding long transport hours, searches, restraints, and time in courthouse holding cells.
Appearing remotely still requires the same professionalism and preparation as an in-person hearing. Legal representatives should:
Before the hearing, review any platform instructions provided by the court. Ensure you know:
Testing audio and video ahead of time helps avoid delays.
Have case documents ready – physical copies can reduce the need to switch between digital sources during the hearing.
Because clients cannot whisper to counsel in a virtual courtroom, agree ahead of time how to communicate during the hearing, whether via secure messaging, email, or platform-provided private rooms.
Camera angle, lighting, and background all contribute to how participants perceive you. A stable setup helps maintain courtroom decorum and clarity.
Even well-prepared participants depend on the court’s ability to run secure, reliable hearings. Judicial organizations and correctional facilities increasingly require technology that:
These capabilities are no longer optional. They are essential to clearing backlogs, improving access to justice, and maintaining continuity of operations during disruptions such as extreme weather, transport strikes, or building closures.
Paulding County Sheriff’s Office modernized its arraignment workflow with Pexip’s video platform, enabling safer and more efficient proceedings. The move reduced prisoner transport, streamlined daily operations, and helped the facility maintain safe operations during a challenging period.
The same technology now underpins additional remote interactions, including meetings between inmates, judges, and support services such as counselors and faith-based leaders.
Read the full case study here.
Today’s justice systems require more than general-purpose video meetings. They need platforms that reflect courtroom procedure, safeguard sensitive information, and remain reliable at national scale. Solutions that offer secure workflows, flexible deployments, and broad interoperability help courts run hearings predictably – and ensure that everyone who needs to participate can do so.
Court systems worldwide are now using these capabilities to modernize hearings, reduce backlogs, and make justice more accessible for all.